[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: NM-committee voting scheme

* Goswin von Brederlow (brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de) [040221 13:55]:
> Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> writes:
> > * Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> [2004-02-20 13:28]:

> > > ultimate rejection:
> > > 
> > > The DAM has to be replaced, which is very unlikely.
> > 
> > No, there can be a GR about accepting the applicant against the DAM's
> > wish (you don't have to replace the DAM, just override him in that
> > case).

> But an ultimate rejection is not becoming a DD on his watch. So, if
> the DAM is overruled by a GR, consequently he would have to respond in
> giving up his job. Thats the thread hanging there or not?

No. The sucessful GR would mean that the DAM-vote is overriden. If -
and only if - the DAM would ignore this decision (and violate by this
the constitution), then there'd be a need for this.

> There also doesn't seem to be a timeline for reapplying after an
> ultimate rejection. Ultimate rejection sounds like a life sentence.


> Or can one reapply once the DAM changed? Or call a GR to be allowed to
> reapply?

No, unless this decision is taken back.

   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C

Reply to: