On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 04:41:56PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 08:06:29PM -0000, MJ Ray wrote: > > Gerfried Fuchs <alfie@ist.org> wrote: > > > together, like NM not knowing the policy, AMs still claiming they passed > > > both p&p and t&s, and sponsors not checking the packages before > > > uploading neither it shouldn't be no surprise why the DAM-stage of the > > > NM-process is the only one that seems to stand for quality these days, > > > > Who is responsible for the training and guidance of the AMs? It reads > > on the web like it's the NM committee, ie the AMs, Front Desk and DAM. > > Is that accurate? If so, this list seems to be the given contact point, > > so can I ask what you (all readers) thinks needs doing to improve the > > situation? Real actions only, please. > > At the risk of messing up my application, there needs to be some better > indication of what's happening during the long period of time spent > awaiting DAM approval. From the outside it's a black box with a 2+ > month delay. From my status page, the only thing left is: > > The following things need to happen still: > > * DAM to approve application > * DAM creates new account > On the other hand: What is "the DD to be" doing now he has shown he has the skills, knowns the procedures and has contacts in Debian (advocate, AM, sponsor ) to contribute? > -- > Jamin W. Collins Don't take it personal. Geert Stappers
Attachment:
pgpTR1rmVIKcZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature