Re: Packages in the archive
Thank you for your answer :)
In <[🔎] 20031111091132.GA11956@deprecation.cyrius.com>,
on "Tue, 11 Nov 2003 20:11:33 +1100",
with "Re: Packages in the archive",
Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> wrote:
> * Taketoshi Sano <sano@debian.org> [2003-11-10 23:57]:
> > Is it enough to have a package in _experimental_ area in the archive?
>
> I suppose so. It's not ideal since we don't see how the maintainer
> responds to FTBFS bugs and (to some degree) to bugs submitted by users
> (since less people use experimental). The whole idea of having a
> package in the archive is so we can see that a person has done
> consistent work, responds to bugs and maintains the package properly.
>
> A package is not required just for the sake of it... there's actually
> a good reason for it. So the question you have to ask is whether it
> shows that he maintains the package in a good way.
I see.
> > Is it enough not to have a package as the maintainer
> > (i.e. his name is written in the maintainer field),
> > but to be noted in README.Debian as the co-maintainer ?
>
> Same as above; so, yeah, it's not a problem (although he should
> clearly be listed in Uploaders: if he's a co-maintainer).
OK, now i can tell my applicant about this requirement.
Thank you.
--
Taketoshi Sano: <sano@debian.org>,<sano@debian.or.jp>,<kgh12351@nifty.ne.jp>
Reply to: