[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Public vs private

* Scott James Remnant (scott@netsplit.com) wrote:
> To be honest, the ONLY thing I would like to see on this mailing list is
> James' DAM rejection mails, and the subsequent vote for whether to
> tickle him or not.
> Once that vote has been carried to a rejection, there should be a post
> to newmaint with the actual rejection.

Agreed (with all of it, but no need to quote it all).

Additionally, I don't remember anything in the 'reject' policy about how
to get a vote started...  Maybe I missed it, but if not then perhaps we
should modify it slightly to say something like someone on the NM
committee must propose a vote and be at least seconded?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: