On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 01:51:19PM +1100, Andrew Lau wrote: > On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 02:17:09PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Or were you suggesting that Eray's application should simply be > > rejected, and the file closed? > Personally, I'd rather be rejected than having to wait another a year > for an approval that might never come. At least a rejection would > probably come with an explanation, and having one would finally give > me a reason to move on (away from Debian in that case). But your circumstances are not analogous to Eray's; your application has no public DAM comments on it, so you're essentially in limbo. In Eray's case, OTOH, there is a clearly indicated course of action that he should complete in order to become a DD. If he has not received an outright rejection, this is probably because he hasn't indicated to anyone in charge that he's not willing to complete his application; in which case, there's no reason to think he should be rejected. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgp4yvG43GnDJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature