Re: AM Report for Week Ending 08 Dec 2002
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 08:24:21PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> So, my humble suggestion is that if an NM is fast-tracked, it should
> be noted in the «Notes» field on the applicants page. Just adding
> «Fast-tracked due to debian-installer» or «Fast-tracked due to
> $some_other_reason» would be enough.
That would be, indeed, A Really Good Thing(TM).
Same thing for "being held back without any obvious reason to outside
observers". I've been told off-list that Eray is being held back
because of "special circumstances" surrounding his case. Allow me to
be very straighforward here: I don't care about _Eray_ the person, but
I care about the fact that when I go to http://nm.debian.org/ and look
at his application I see:
http://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=erayo%40cs.bilkent.edu.tr
Received application 2000-08-25
Advocate sunset
Advocate Check Passed on 2000-08-25
Application Manager Assigned guillaum assigned on 2000-10-30
ID Check Passed on 2000-11-03
Philosophy and Procedures Check Passed on 2000-11-26
Tasks and Skills Check Passed on 2000-12-17
Application Manager recomends to DAM Approved on 2000-12-17
DAM Phone Contact Not Required
DAM Approval --
Account Created No
Application Manager Comments
Debian Account Manager Comments
Have asked applicant to get 5 sponsors.
According to that information, he's been sitting at the DAM stage for
_2 years_ and at some point the DAM asked him to get five sponsors for
his application.
The way I read that is that the DAM doesn't think it's appropiate to
approve the application, but doesn't have any particular reason to
reject it and has asked five developers to pitch in and say "yes, I
think it should be approved". That's fine for two months. But two
years?
Someone will argue this is Eray's fault. Be my guest ...
We send nagmail for people at the advocate stage. But we don't seem to
have checks for people at the AM or DAM stages ("applicant has been
waiting for two weeks but hasn't been yet accepted by AM", "applicant
has been at the NM stage longer than three months and hasn't been put
on hold", "applicant has been waiting for DAM approval for more than
six months", ...)
--
Marcelo
Reply to: