Re: AM Report for Week Ending 27 May 2001
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 11:10:51AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Craig Small <csmall@eye-net.com.au> [20010529 08:22]:
> > Perhaps its more of a warnnig, it shouldn't happen for very long.
>
> Yes, it's just a reminder. There might be good reasons why someone
> has completed all checks but isn't approved yet... the 'random checks'
> should simply decrease the checks the FD has to do manually -- but of
> course manual checks are still needed to see why something is the way
> it is...
Yeah, there are often extremely valid reasons that don't relate to
inactivity, laziness, or whatever, at all.
:) d
--
Daniel Stone <daniel@kabuki.openfridge.net> <daniel@kabuki.sfarc.net>
Reply to: