[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Assigned to non-responsive AM

On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 04:01:14PM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 01:31:05AM +0000, James Troup wrote:
> > Err, now, I don't want to comment on the specific AM (i.e. Anand),
> > but, FFS, this is *ridiculous*!  One _week_?!  I've had plenty of
> > applicants not respond to my enquires in longer than that; should I
> > start rejecting them for such appalling unresponsiveness?  Sheesh.
> Yeah, you should and do it now :)
> If I bounced applicants after one week, then I think 50% of them
> wouldn't be there.

I'm not sure if this is serious or not...

Taral <taral@taral.net>
Please use PGP/GPG to send me mail.
"Never ascribe to malice what can as easily be put down to stupidity."

Attachment: pgpvVnFRjoVBQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: