Re: Assigned to non-responsive AM
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 01:31:05AM +0000, James Troup wrote:
> Err, now, I don't want to comment on the specific AM (i.e. Anand),
> but, FFS, this is *ridiculous*! One _week_?! I've had plenty of
> applicants not respond to my enquires in longer than that; should I
> start rejecting them for such appalling unresponsiveness? Sheesh.
Yeah, you should and do it now :)
If I bounced applicants after one week, then I think 50% of them
wouldn't be there.
Craig Small VK2XLZ GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/ <firstname.lastname@example.org>
MIEEE <email@example.com> Debian developer <firstname.lastname@example.org>