Re: Putting people on hold postings
In <[🔎] firstname.lastname@example.org>,
on 18 Feb 2001 17:49:06 +0100,
on Putting people on hold postings,
Falk Hueffner <email@example.com> wrote:
> can somebody explain why we are supposed to post a message here if we
> put somebody on hold? I mean, if it is not justified the applicant
> will complain, so I don't see any reason for us to check that.
Well, we didn't do that at early stage, so there may be some reasons
to do so now.
Perhaps "silently putting on-hold" is not good in some cases, for ex.
when the AM and the aplicant have some problem in mail-exchange or
the AM and the applicant have some disagreement in something.
Public "on-hold posting" may work to inform the applicant and others
about the on-hold itself.
Taketoshi Sano: <firstname.lastname@example.org>,<email@example.com>,<firstname.lastname@example.org>