Re: Formal request for a new developer to not be allowed into debian
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Craig Small wrote:
> This line is what you are complaining about?
> OK, it is hardly Mariusz's finest hour but I think I can speak for the
> rest of the NM team here and say we've all seen worse, much worse.
> My person opinion is if that's the worst he's said, then it's not
> that bad at all. A bit silly, a bit dumb, but not in the
> nail-him-to-the-wall class.
> Of course, there may be plenty more Mariusz has done wrong, but I'm
> seeing a single dumb email with a single dumb line. From what I can see,
> there is no reason to bounce him.
Please read the rest of -devel. This is a continuing example that I have seem
----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL++++ P+ L++++ !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
----BEGIN PGP INFO----
Adam Heath <email@example.com> Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E 63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP
AD46 C888 F587 F8A3 A6DA 3261 8A2C 7DC2 8BD4 A489 | 8BD4A489 GPG
-----END PGP INFO-----