[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: David Bishop on Hold]

On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Clay Crouch wrote:

> I would agree that a person does not need a @debian.org to do
> bug fixes/QA stuff. But, IMHO, if he's willing to do it, and does
> a rather good job of it, we _should_ reward him with Developer
> status.
> Maybe this HO opens a can of worms re: rewards for volunteering,
> but IMHO, QA could use all the help they can get, and if someone
> makes themselves useful, it would be rather crass of us to say
> something to the effect of "you don't need dev status to do that."

Someone who does really QA work should get an @debian address if he does
good work. But in this case it's a theoretical discussion because I
haven't seen David Bishop doing any QA work.

> Just mu US$0.02.
> Cheers!


A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
"Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble.
                -- Mahatma Ghandi

Reply to: