Re: ElGamal key restriction
Hi. I'll update using your text. Thanks.
In <[🔎] 20001013075251.B23586@gecko23.dse.beckman.com>,
on Fri, 13 Oct 2000 07:52:52 -0700,
on Re: ElGamal key restriction,
Matt Kraai <kraai@alumni.carnegiemellon.edu> wrote:
> > If so then Sano can put in a link to the message I guess.
>
> Thanks for posting the explanation. After sending the email I found out
> about the incompatible signature problem, and wanted to make sure that
> this (rather than some kind of insecure key generation) was responsible
> for the requirement. Could the wording of the web page be changed to
> something like the following?
>
> Note: ElGamal signatures generated by GPG <= 1.0.1 are incompatible with
> later versions. Such signatures must be regenerated by GPG >= 1.0.2.
>
> Perhaps it should also mention that the ElGamal keys do *not* need to be
> regenerated, only the signatures created by ElGamal keys.
--
Taketoshi Sano: <sano@debian.org>,<sano@debian.or.jp>,<kgh12351@nifty.ne.jp>
Reply to: