gnupg 1.0.1 <-> gnupg 1.0.2 problem? (Re: AM Report on Chris Rutter)
At Tue, 19 Sep 2000 22:58:29 +0900,
Fumitoshi UKAI <email@example.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 10:42:52PM +0900, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
> > > Does anyone else see my pgp signature was bad?
> > Couldn't resist.
> > ME TOO!!
> > Looks like you have a problem.
I think I find the problem.
* It can be verified by pgp-i and gnupg 1.0.1-2 in mutt 1.2.5-1
No problem. It says: Good signature
* It can't be verified by gnupg 1.0.2-1 in mutt 1.2.5-1
It says: Bad signature
gpg-rsa in potato and woody are the same version 2.1.1.
Note that the message has been signed by pgp-i (on potato machine)
It looks like gnupg 1.0.2 bug. Can anyone else check it?