Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process)
On Thu, 03 Aug 2000, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> Dale Scheetz writes:
>
> > I just can't understand the reluctance to satisfy this requirement except
> > that it is viewed by some as being too hard. I cannot, for the life of me,
>
> You've not been reading my emails then. I don't want random people
> having a copy of my passport digitised (worse still, digitised and
> signed my me). I know other people who would be unhappy about
> this. It's not necessary, so ditch it.
100% ACK.
I'm currently in the nm queue - still waiting for an AM. If the process
begins and the ID is still required I think I'ld comply. However I would
hate it, that's for sure.
yours,
peter
--
PGP encrypted messages preferred.
http://www.cosy.sbg.ac.at/~ppalfrad/
[please CC me on lists]
Reply to: