Re: lv2file 0.95

[Dennis Braun <d_braun@kabelmail.de>]

Ok, sorry for the noise.
after i removed my local repo and cloned the lvfile repo again i have 
found the new 0.95 tag, strange.
somehow we have now double upstream tags, one in capital letters, one 
normal.
Well, the build looks good now: 
https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/lv2file/-/pipelines/351486
Do you use irc too? :) if yes, you can find me in oftc under the nick snd.

Am 21.02.22 um 20:57 schrieb Dennis Braun:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> thank you :)
> hm but the salsa repo was not updated properly, there is no new 
> pristine tar file/data.
> also on github there is no new tag, 0.93 is the last?
>
> Please read: 
> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/DevelopPackaging#Uploading_new_upstream_version_to_existing_repository
>
> Best regards,
> Dennis
>
> Am 21.02.22 um 19:56 schrieb Jeremy Salwen:
> > Hi Dennis,
> >
> > I have updated the debian repository with lv2file upstream 0.95.
> >
> > The debian patches were upstreamed so I removed them, and I also updated
> > the watch file to point to the correct upstream tag.
> >
> > I am not sure if there is more I need to do for the release, I 
> > updated the
> > changelog with UNRELEASED, I am unsure whether I should be changing 
> > that to
> > `unstable`.
> >
> > Jeremy