Re: jack 0.94.0-2
>>>>> "rj" == Robert Joerdens <robertjo@phys.ethz.ch> writes:
rj> On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
>> Robert, as stated in my previous post, I'd like to keep
>> synchronized DeMuDi with Debian with respect to the jack
>> library. Is there a time line which maintainers of jack
>> dependent packages are supposed to respect when a new version
>> of the jack library is uploaded and all such packages need to
>> be rebuilt?
rj> Hmm. For 0.94.0-2 nothing has to be rebuild. It contains only
rj> small fixes. Or am I not understanding you correctly?
Given that I don't know this issue in depth, I thought it was
necessary to rebuild all jack related applications against this new
release. If I am wrong, that is no ABI/API changes were introduced and
the applications built against the previous package of the jack
library are compatible with the new release, please just ignore my
note.
bye,
free
Reply to: