Re: [a-devel] AGNULA/DeMuDi 1.1.1 and 2.6.x kernel

To: Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
Cc: AGNULA development issues <developers@lists.agnula.org>, debian-multimedia <debian-multimedia@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: [a-devel] AGNULA/DeMuDi 1.1.1 and 2.6.x kernel
From: "Jack O'Quin" <joq@io.com>
Date: 07 Jun 2004 14:11:45 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 87vfi3p4i6.fsf@sulphur.joq.us>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1086581625.2395.21.camel@cmn37.stanford.edu>
References: <20040524142425.GD2866@yahoo.fr> <1085532094.18126.1531.camel@cmn37.stanford.edu> <1086235429.1164.32.camel@cmn37.stanford.edu> <[🔎] 87n03kl88k.fsf@agnula.org> <[🔎] 1086382676.8305.66.camel@cmn37.stanford.edu> <[🔎] 877jumss2o.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <[🔎] 1086460994.12942.39.camel@cmn37.stanford.edu> <[🔎] 874qpoqaoj.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <[🔎] 1086581625.2395.21.camel@cmn37.stanford.edu>

Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU> writes:

> Hmmm, I'm testing with 0.98.0 (with the optimization problem patched
> away). Maybe something in 0.98.3 is very different?

I installed 0.98.0 today for a while.  

Seems to run about the same here.
-- 
  joq

Reply to:

References:
- Re: [a-devel] AGNULA/DeMuDi 1.1.1 and 2.6.x kernel
  - From: Free Ekanayaka <free@agnula.org>
- Re: [a-devel] AGNULA/DeMuDi 1.1.1 and 2.6.x kernel
  - From: Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
- Re: [a-devel] AGNULA/DeMuDi 1.1.1 and 2.6.x kernel
  - From: "Jack O'Quin" <joq@io.com>
- Re: [a-devel] AGNULA/DeMuDi 1.1.1 and 2.6.x kernel
  - From: Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
- Re: [a-devel] AGNULA/DeMuDi 1.1.1 and 2.6.x kernel
  - From: "Jack O'Quin" <joq@io.com>
- Re: [a-devel] AGNULA/DeMuDi 1.1.1 and 2.6.x kernel
  - From: Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>

Prev by Date: Re: [a-devel] AGNULA/DeMuDi 1.1.1 and 2.6.x kernel
Next by Date: producer_thread not running
Previous by thread: Re: [a-devel] AGNULA/DeMuDi 1.1.1 and 2.6.x kernel
Next by thread: producer_thread not running
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread