Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch
On 20.09.2016 23:46, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 09/20/2016 11:16 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> - powerpc: No porter (RM blocker)
> I'd be happy to pick up powerpc to keep it for Stretch. I'm already
> maintaining powerpcspe which is very similar to powerpc.
No, you are not maintaining powerpcspe as a release architecture, and that's
something different than building packages for some of the ports architectures.
If you can get powerpcspe accepted as a release architecture, then maybe you
gain some credibility to maintain another release architecture ;)