Re: Bug#767291: blitz++: FTBFS on mips
Hi,
since Dejan confirmed that the problem is not in the package itself and
it builds *in principle* on mips I hereby close this bug to ensure that
the migration will not only be blocked because of this bug once the mips
porters took the needed means to build the package successfully.
Ivo, I hope you agree with this, if not please reopen.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:49:24AM +0000, Dejan Latinovic wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
> Maybe it is possible to blacklist blitz++ on cavium machines,
> and try to build it on broadcom board (ball, swarm).
>
> I had tested it locally.
> On cavium board,
> build fail with TERM signal.
> If tests are ran manually, all tests pass,
> but requires a lot of time.
>
> Actually, the array test is the one that
> causes this failure.
> All other tests executes significantly faster.
> (1-10 min).
>
> Duration of array test execution on cavium board is:
> 304m40.451s.
>
>
> On broadcom board,
> package builds successfully.
> Duration of array test execution on broadcom board is:
> 12m50.570s.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Dejna
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Andreas Tille [andreas@an3as.eu]
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 8:53 AM
> To: 767291@bugs.debian.org
> Cc: debian-mips@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#767291: blitz++: FTBFS on mips
>
> Hi Ivo,
>
> thanks for the bug report.
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:14:00PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> > package: blitz++
> > version: 1:0.10-2
> > severity: serious
> >
> > It seems the latest upload of blitz++ failed on mips, but it built fine
> > before. This prevents migration to testing.
>
> I'm aware of this fact ind just contacted mips porters[1]. I had the
> experience with several other packages that this is due to a not as
> powerful enough build machine. The build failure [2]
>
> ...
> Running examples...
> E: Caught signal ‘Terminated’: terminating immediately
>
> could leat to the conclusion that this is the case here as well. As I
> explained in my mail to the mips porters[1] my personal solution to deal
> with this would be to ask ftpmasters to remove the package for mips
> architecture to enable a migration to testing. I will wait until the
> end of the weekend for any response to find a better solution before
> I'll do this.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
>
> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-mips/2014/10/msg00021.html
> [2] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=blitz%2B%2B&suite=sid
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=blitz%2B%2B&arch=mips&ver=1%3A0.10-2&stamp=1412974511
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mips-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141030075301.GA17506@an3as.eu
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: