Re: mips/mipsel diskless buildds? (was: qualification for Wheezy)

To: Steven Chamberlain <steven@pyro.eu.org>
Cc: debian-mips@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: mips/mipsel diskless buildds? (was: qualification for Wheezy)
From: Andreas Barth <aba@ayous.org>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 16:09:21 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20120520140921.GI2385@mails.so.argh.org>
Mail-followup-to: Andreas Barth <aba@ayous.org>, Steven Chamberlain <steven@pyro.eu.org>, debian-mips@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4FB78318.8060804@pyro.eu.org>
References: <[🔎] 20120518214637.GC2385@mails.so.argh.org> <[🔎] 4FB78318.8060804@pyro.eu.org>

* Steven Chamberlain (steven@pyro.eu.org) [120519 13:25]:
> I wondered why boxes like these are not diskless, with storage and swap
> provisioned on some sort of NAS, perhaps via iSCSI. [...]

Thanks for your suggestions. I forwarded them to the debian sysadmins
who take care of all server hardware for Debian, including the
buildds.


Andi

Reply to:

References:
- Re: mips and mipsel qualification for Wheezy
  - From: Andreas Barth <aba@ayous.org>
- Re: mips/mipsel diskless buildds? (was: qualification for Wheezy)
  - From: Steven Chamberlain <steven@pyro.eu.org>

Prev by Date: Re: mips and mipsel qualification for Wheezy
Next by Date: Re: mips and mipsel qualification for Wheezy
Previous by thread: Re: mips/mipsel diskless buildds? (was: qualification for Wheezy)
Next by thread: Re: mips and mipsel qualification for Wheezy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread