Re: [debian-mips][icedtea-jamvm] Any one using the icedtea-6-jre-jamvm on mipsel?
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: [debian-mips][icedtea-jamvm] Any one using the icedtea-6-jre-jamvm on mipsel?
- From: Javier Vasquez <email@example.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:00:57 -0600
- Message-id: <CALUrRGe1jinV4q6t8cyCn=i42VW0iXJ7WL9v0jyE8iobVuRdFQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <CALUrRGczf2kEr0BASO6KntOHX070Y5M9G08qSG=c5pq8i+9NPA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CALUrRGczf2kEr0BASO6KntOHX070Y5M9G08qSG=c5pq8i+9NPA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Javier Vasquez <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I just installed icedtea-6-jre-jamvm, which depends upon
> openjdk-6-jre-headless, and it provides the shared library libjvm.so.
> For some reason debian doesn't link this library inside
> /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins, but when creating the link by hand, it
> happens that when starting iceweasel, there's no indication of any
> failure (on the term it was started), and when going to
> "about:plugins" there's no sign of the plugin.
> When trying to configure alternatives for mozilla-javaplugin.so, none
> is found unless the icetea-netx is installed, in which case the only
> alternative is the plugin provided by it, and when loading an applet
> one can read in the term that the plugin loaded of course was the zero
> hotspot one.
> I looked under google for options on the subject with no success. Is
> the package broken, or am I missing something? Is there a howto
I experimented with the following, under jre/lib/mipsel:
mv server/libjvm.so server/libjvm.so.orig
ln -s ../jamvm/libjvm.so
And then when doing:
I got the right version (the inline, not the zero hotspot)... So
that's good news, however in order to have the icedtea plugin so, I
still need to have the netx installed.
I was expecting a perfomance boost on applets, but I didn't noticed
any at least on gmail, :-)
Not sure if that's all to be done, cause if so, I better stick with netx, :-)