On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 15:00:08 +1100 Tom McAvaney <tjmcavaney@gmail.com> wrote: > > Greetings! Are there any non-official porterboxes available for > > mips only debugging? Or is the policy henceforward that packagers > > need to setup qemu or exclude mips? FTR, I do find the statement 'setup qemu or exclude mips' unnecessarily antagonistic :/ > I am a mere user and no authority at all, but my understanding is that > now mahler is down the MIPS port is dependent on individual > developers/packagers having access to/maintaining their own machines. Another mere user here ;) > It would be a shame if packagers abandoned MIPS for lack of hardware > for debugging ... Does anyone know if replacement/repair of mahler is > on anyones to do list? AIUI, there is more mips hardware 'in the wings', but debian is currently to unstable for them to make a useful buildd (locking up under load). DSA can probably correct me if I'm out of line :) kk > In the meantime, depending on how much hand-holding you're willing to > do, I (or others on the list) might be able to help with testing on > one of my SGI Indys. -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature