On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 04:55:00PM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: >Siggy Brentrup wrote: > >>I granted SSH access to my Indy in the past and am still willing to do >>so; but as you may imagine there are some caveats, > >Of course. > >>in particular in >>view of your domain name and Organization header, those are signposts. > >Many people have vanity domains. That is mine :-). > >>>I am a Debian Maintainer and I am also the main upstream author of >>>libsndfile: >> >>I searched the DD database to no avail, using 'de Castro Lopo' and >>'de Castro' in the name field, fuzzy search turned on. Please give >>me a hint how I can verify you're really a DD. > >Notce I said I am a Debian Maintainer not a DD. As a DM I am not on >the main DD GPG key ring, but I am on the debian-maintainers keyring >for version >= 1.60. Erik de Castro Lopo is a DM. You can install the Debian Package debian-maintainers and you'll that his key with ID 43B8D6C8 is in /usr/share/keyrings/debian-maintainers.gpg See also: http://git.debian.org/?p=d-m/debian-maintainers.git;a=commitdiff;h=6e920c6cf2a2dff8917fa0228a9f2ee18517d30b >I will GPG sign this email and you can check the web of trust. > >>> http://www.mega-nerd.com/libsndfile/ > >You will also find that this page is the main homepage for libsndfile >a library that has been in Debian for at least 8 years and that I am >the main author. > >I also have a history of fixing obscure libsndfile related bugs. See: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=515949 > >>To finish there are still some technical issues: >> >>1. atm the system is in a horrible state somewhat etch-minus-a-half. >> It didn't run for more than 4y, in an old motd I found 'This >> system is tracking Debian/sid' whatever was called sid in '04. >> During a dist-upgrade to etch I lost X and decided to reinstall, >> hence my offer to test an installer. > >A current Sid system would be useful. > >>2. Which environment do you need for testing? For sure >> >> apt-get build-dep libsndfile >> >> Any HW requirements, libs that shouldn't be installed to not >> interfere with dependencies, more ...? > >Since the problem may be with libogg or libvorbis, I may need an SVN >client to do an anon get of the ogg/vorbis sources. > > >>3. All further communication containing access details will be >> gpg-encrypted. >> >>Hoping you are not too much pissed off by my prudence. > >I am not pissed off by your prudence :-). > >CHeers, >Erik >-- >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Erik de Castro Lopo >http://www.mega-nerd.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature