[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: O2 boot



Hi Lee and Martin,

This call trace looks similar to the one I just reported against
2.6.25-rc5.
Martin, do you think it is the same?


Il giorno mer, 12/03/2008 alle 18.09 -0600, dleecurt@cc.usu.edu ha
scritto:
> Ok here you go, it seemed like there was more when I was using the graphical
> console.
> 
> CPU 0 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000000000,
> epc == 98000000013f1160, ra == 98000000013f1160
> Oops[#1]:
[...]
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff8028e544>] cdrom_open+0x3b4/0xf70
> [<ffffffff800b6cf4>] d_kill+0x84/0xa8
> [<ffffffff800ad67c>] link_path_walk+0x154/0x298
> [<ffffffff800ad668>] link_path_walk+0x140/0x298
> [<ffffffff801df9d8>] kobject_get+0x20/0x38
> [<ffffffff801d4768>] get_disk+0x88/0xc0
> [<ffffffff801d47b0>] exact_lock+0x10/0x28
> [<ffffffff80285208>] sr_block_open+0xb8/0x138
> [<ffffffff800d6558>] blkdev_open+0x0/0xc0
> [<ffffffff800d6050>] do_open+0x98/0x328
> [<ffffffff800d6558>] blkdev_open+0x0/0xc0
> [<ffffffff800d65a0>] blkdev_open+0x48/0xc0
> [<ffffffff8009dcd4>] __dentry_open+0x104/0x2a8
> [<ffffffff8009dfa8>] do_filp_open+0x48/0x58
> [<ffffffff8009dfa8>] do_filp_open+0x48/0x58
> [<ffffffff8009dadc>] get_unused_fd+0x5c/0x150
> [<ffffffff8009e01c>] do_sys_open+0x64/0x130
> [<ffffffff8001ba68>] handle_sys+0x128/0x144
> [<ffffffff800a4628>] sys_readlink+0x0/0x18
> [<ffffffff8005fcf3>] sys_init_module+0x882/0x1b28

Bye,
Giuseppe


Reply to: