Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel
Last year, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * Raphael Hertzog <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2007-11-28 10:55]:
> > > > mips and mipsel have more buildds (mayr and mayer) but one has
> > > > problems with its fan and the other with its psu. I don't know what
> > > > is being done about this as the RT ticket is not public (or at least
> > > > wasn't last time I checked).
> > > Which one? There's no such ticket AFAIK. Feel free to submit them.
> > > (and I have access to the DSA private tickets)
> > Ryan told me there's one. Maybe there isn't - I don't know.
> I just opened two tickets:
> A full-text search on mayr and mayer didn't lead to any relevant (open)
> ticket so I probably didn't miss any.
> Raphaël Hertzog
any news from this potential mips(el) buildd? The current buildd are not
keeping up and this is causing trouble to all the teams who are concerned with
the migration to testing of their updates.
Have a nice day,
Debian-Med packaging team
Wakō, Saitama, Japan