Re: Bug#387498: Unable to reproduce - mips/mipsel? 2.4/2.6 kernel difference?

[Camm Maguire <camm@enhanced.com>]

Greetings!  Don't know if this helps, but gcl 2.6.7-21 failed on
mips(el) autobuilders for the same reason.

Take care,

Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> writes:

> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 11:19:11AM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
> >Greetings, and thanks for looking into this!  It is still there on the
> >sid dchroot on vaughan:
> >
> >camm@vaughan:~$ cat t.c
> >int
> >main(int argc,char * argv[]) {return system(argv[1]);}
> >camm@vaughan:~$ cc -g  t.c -o t
> >camm@vaughan:~$ ./t "echo g"
> >g
> >camm@vaughan:~$ cc -g -pg  t.c -o t
> >camm@vaughan:~$ ./t "echo g"
> >
> >
> >
> >[1]+  Stopped                 ./t "echo g"
> >camm@vaughan:~$ camm@vaughan:~$ kill %1
> >
> >
> >[1]+  Stopped                 ./t "echo g"
> >camm@vaughan:~$ [1]+  Terminated              ./t "echo g"
> >camm@vaughan:~$ gdb ./t
> 
> Hmmm. I suspect that this might even be a problem with vaughan rather
> than libc. I just logged in to check on this, and did a chroot
> unstable. Then:
> 
> 93sam@vaughan:~$ cp ~camm/t.c .
> Segmentation fault
> 
> I can't reproduce that again, now, but...
> 
> -- 
> Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                steve@einval.com
> "Since phone messaging became popular, the young generation has lost the
>  ability to read or write anything that is longer than one hundred and sixty
>  characters."  -- Ignatios Souvatzis

-- 
Camm Maguire			     			camm@enhanced.com
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah