[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#387498: Unable to reproduce - mips/mipsel? 2.4/2.6 kernel difference?

On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 11:19:11AM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
>Greetings, and thanks for looking into this!  It is still there on the
>sid dchroot on vaughan:
>camm@vaughan:~$ cat t.c
>main(int argc,char * argv[]) {return system(argv[1]);}
>camm@vaughan:~$ cc -g  t.c -o t
>camm@vaughan:~$ ./t "echo g"
>camm@vaughan:~$ cc -g -pg  t.c -o t
>camm@vaughan:~$ ./t "echo g"
>[1]+  Stopped                 ./t "echo g"
>camm@vaughan:~$ camm@vaughan:~$ kill %1
>[1]+  Stopped                 ./t "echo g"
>camm@vaughan:~$ [1]+  Terminated              ./t "echo g"
>camm@vaughan:~$ gdb ./t

Hmmm. I suspect that this might even be a problem with vaughan rather
than libc. I just logged in to check on this, and did a chroot
unstable. Then:

93sam@vaughan:~$ cp ~camm/t.c .
Segmentation fault

I can't reproduce that again, now, but...

Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                steve@einval.com
"Since phone messaging became popular, the young generation has lost the
 ability to read or write anything that is longer than one hundred and sixty
 characters."  -- Ignatios Souvatzis

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: