removing linux-mips.org from the cc: list, since this is actually Debian stuff. On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 05:23:39PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > I saw that and am updating it. I was planing of sending you a patch > when its done and working. If you feel your time is running short Please be _very_ carefull. Just updating to .24 won't help. It's broken on almost all subarchs relevant to Debian. > Is the kernel-patch-2.4.22-mips relative to the debian kernel source > or the vanilla source? And is the result (after patching) the mips cvs > or cvs merged with the debian patch? And should that be done that way > again? We build against kernel-image-2.4.x debian package but we diff against linux-mips.org CVS. > Apart from updating the patch (vanila->mips cvs, testing if it gives > any conflicts now) I added my own system XXS1500 board from MyCable to > the configs and added the kernel-image deb and udebs to the control > file. No major changes yet. That's no big deal. Updated configs are very welcome as long (and as they are not mips64 since we don't build these by default yet). > Have you thought about dropping the udebs and letting debian-installer > build -di udebs the way it does for several other arches now? What would this buy us? -- Guido
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature