Re: config.guess vs. mips?

To: Richard.Kreckel@Uni-Mainz.DE
Cc: debian-mips@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: config.guess vs. mips?
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 15:21:26 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020116152126.A2210@c102-tbm1.uibk.ac.at>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0201161226270.3772-100000@higgs.physik.uni-mainz.de>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0201161226270.3772-100000@higgs.physik.uni-mainz.de>

* Richard B. Kreckel <kreckel@ginac.de> [20020116 12:39]:
> I see that one of my packages suddenly fails to build on mips [0] and this
> seems to be related to the fact that config.guess and config.sub were
> updated to the latest versions from FSF upstream and now they fail.  Can

I think this is fixed in newer config.guess and config.sub upstream.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
tbm@cyrius.com

Reply to:

References:
- config.guess vs. mips?
  - From: "Richard B. Kreckel" <kreckel@ginac.de>

Prev by Date: config.guess vs. mips?
Next by Date: Re: atlas
Previous by thread: config.guess vs. mips?
Next by thread: Re: config.guess vs. mips?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread