Re: Archive purge?
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 05:27:30PM -0700, Ryan Murray wrote:
>
> Dynamic libraries have a header of one or the other -- and only one kind is
> understood by ld.so (the new, or the old).
>
I did get that - But what is the incompatible change - I read something
on the load address. So why has the load address been different and
why has this to change NOW ? Why is the load address we have now
beeing considered broken.
Nobody has answered these points. There is a patch breaking backward
compatibility for no good reason (That i can see now) so why
does everybody just talk about breaking it ?
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff flo@rfc822.org +49-5201-669912
Why is it called "common sense" when nobody seems to have any?
Reply to: