[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1120945: RFS: pajladaserialize/0.1.0-1 [ITP] -- C serialize/deserialize helper functions based on rapidjson



Control: tags -1 moreinfo

Hi 

(this is not a formal review)

Just to put you in the right direction: Your library packages are not
really packaged like libraries should be packaged in Debian,
for example your binary package names are wrong. (they generally start
with "lib")

There are other issues too, but ENOTIME for a proper review. (e.g
I think your binary packages misses Depends: lines)

Please check other (header only) libraries as examples and read up on
the topic e.g 

As libraries are advanced packages, I'd also suggest to start with *one*
library, get that sponsored, and then go for the rest with the knowledge
gained from the first sponsoring.

Cheers,
tobi

On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 12:32:20AM +0800, solomoncyj wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> Dear mentors,
> 
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pajladaserialize":
> 
>  * Package name     : pajladaserialize
>    Version          : 0.1.0-1
>    Upstream contact : pajlada <rasmus.karlsson@pajlada.com>
>  * URL              : https://github.com/pajlada/serialize
>  * License          : Expat
>  * Vcs              : https://salsa.debian.org/solomoncyj/pajladaserialize
>    Section          : libs
> 
> The source builds the following binary packages:
> 
>   pajladaserialize-dev - C++ serialize/deserialize helper functions
> based on rapidjson
> 
> To access further information about this package, please visit the
> following URL:
> 
>   https://mentors.debian.net/package/pajladaserialize/
> 
> Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:
> 
>   dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pajladaserialize/pajladaserialize_0.1.0-1.dsc
> 
> Changes for the initial release:
> 
>  pajladaserialize (0.1.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
>  .
>    * Initial release. Closes: #1120921
> 
> Regards,
> 


Reply to: