[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1120442: RFS: herbstluftwm/0.9.5-3.1 [NMU] [RC] -- manual tiling window manager for X11



Control: tags -1 moreinfo

Hi Alexander,


On Sun, Nov 09, 2025 at 06:43:36PM +0100, Alexander Sulfrian wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: important
> X-Debbugs-CC: christoph@debian.org
> 
> Dear mentors,
> 
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "herbstluftwm":
> 
>  * Package name     : herbstluftwm
>    Version          : 0.9.5-3.1
>    Upstream contact : Thorsten Wißmann <edu@thorsten-wissmann.de>
>  * URL              : https://herbstluftwm.org
>  * License          : Simplified BSD
>  * Vcs              : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/herbstluftwm
>    Section          : x11
> 
> The source builds the following binary packages:
> 
>   herbstluftwm - manual tiling window manager for X11
> 
> To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:
> 
>   https://mentors.debian.net/package/herbstluftwm/
> 
> Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:
> 
>   dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/herbstluftwm/herbstluftwm_0.9.5-3.1.dsc
> 
> Changes since the last upload:
> 
>  herbstluftwm (0.9.5-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
>  .
>    * Non-maintainer upload.
>    * Import upstream patch to fix FTBFS with GCC-15 (Closes: #1096802)
>    * Update legacy build-dependencies:
>      + libfreetype6-dev -> libfreetype-dev
>      + pkg-config -> pkgconf
>    * Update standards version to 4.7.2
>      + Update window manager priority to 40

Some of these changes are inappropiate for a NMU,
NMUs should be *targeted* fixes.
Please consult the developers-reference on this topic for details.

Specifically everything that does not close filed bugs or is just
cosmetics is not appropiate. Bumping S-V in an NMU is not within the
scope of an NMU. 
Please revert this changes and then reupload a new package to mentors.

Remove the moreinfo tag when ready.

-- 
tobi


Reply to: