[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#1109818: RFS: sc3-vowel/0~20220104.ab59caa-1 [ITP] -- Vowel Quark extension for SuperCollider



Hi Phil, Tiago,

Thanks for your comments on reviewing this package.

Best,

Le 01/08/2025 à 06:23, Phil Wyett a écrit :
> On Thu, 2025-07-31 at 16:18 -0400, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 09:24:39AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
>>> Joenio,
>>>
>>> Could you please target a release in your upload to mentors, either
>>> 'unstable'
>>> or 'experimental' not 'UNRELEASED'.
>>>
>>
>> I'm one of those sponsoring Joenio's packages and I think that's fine to
>> have UNRELEASED in mentors, as he's following a team policy and want to
>> keep mentors and VCS sync'ed.
>>
>> Bests,
>>
> 
> All,
> 
> I have no decision making power within the Debian Project, so will go with what
> I am told.
> 
> Request For Sponsor (RFS) or we could say Ready For Sponsor in the eyes of the
> uploader. If ready and uploaded to Debian Mentors, I would think that it should
> be targeted at a distribution pocket as this is the only way it can be correctly
> built against and tested. This is a neat way to do things and I feel correct for
> a dsc upload.
> 
> Working out of Version Control System (VCS) I think we should also target a
> distribution pocket for the same reasons above. An RFS can be filed pointing to
> VCS rather than a Debian Mentors upload. Once everybody is happy you then tag
> it.
> 
> Could people take ownership of RFS bugs, then nobody will touch it.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Phil
> 


Reply to: