[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#1109777: RFS: python-renardo/0.9.12-1 [ITP] -- python-based language and editor for making music (launcher)



On Thu, 2025-07-31 at 16:35 -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> On Thursday, July 31, 2025 4:14:04 PM Mountain Standard Time Tiago Bortoletto 
> Vaz wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 04:10:25PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> > > On Thursday, July 31, 2025 1:03:51 PM Mountain Standard Time Tiago
> > > Bortoletto
> > > 
> > > Vaz wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 08:02:39AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > > > > All,
> > > > > 
> > > > > This is in the NEW queue, closing.
> > > > 
> > > > Please do not close ITP bugs as they'll be automatically closed once
> > > > the packaged is accepted by ftp-master. They're in NEW but can still be
> > > > rejected.
> > > 
> > > As far as I can tell, Phil closed the RFS bug, not the ITP bug.  Closing 
> the
> > > RFS bug is the correct behavior when a package enters NEW.  You are 
> correct
> > > that any ITP bug should remain open and will automatically be closed when 
> a
> > > package clears NEW.
> > 
> > All good then, thanks for pointing out!
> 
> The name of the bug is non-standard and includes both RFS and [ITP], so it is 
> easy to get confused about which bug it actually is.
> 

Morning Soren,

I am dropping a recipient, but hope they see this email. I am not allowed direct
contact with Debian Application Managers and until stated otherwise I am
sticking to the letter of things to avoid being kicked out of Debian. I am sure
you understand why I am being so cautious.

On to business and fun stuff...

Not really non-standard[1] going by the page linked. Also not sure how
'reportbug' generates an RFS as I have never used it to do one. It can get
confusing and will admit it, a double take to look again at subject lines is a
common occurrence here. :-)

As you know, closing the RFS on upload has always been the norm and yes we leave
all ITP bugs for auto closing when they are accepted into Debian. I hope all is
clarified now and we can move on.

[1] https://mentors.debian.net/sponsors/rfs-howto/

-- 

Blog: https://blog.kathenas.org

GPG Fingerprint: 70A0 AC45 AC77 9EFE 84F6 3AED 724A A9B5 2F02 4C8B

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: