[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#1104244: RFS: foomuuri/0.28-1 [ITA] -- multizone bidirectional nftables firewall



On Saturday, June 21, 2025 2:56:39 AM Mountain Standard Time Kim B. Heino 
wrote:
> > > > * Package name     : foomuuri
> > > > 
> > > >   Version          : 0.28-1
> > > >   Upstream contact : Kim B. Heino <b@bbbs.net>
> > > > 
> > > > * URL              : https://github.com/FoobarOy/foomuuri
> > > > * License          : GPL-2+
> > > > * Vcs              : https://salsa.debian.org/kimheino/foomuuri
> > > > 
> > > >   Section          : net
> > 
> > Mostly looks good.  The only problem I see is that, because foomuuri
> > is being back-ported to Bookworm, the systemd files cannot be
> > unconditio- nally installed into /usr/lib/systemd:
> > dh-sequence-movetousr needs to be retained.
> 
> Oh, yes. That would be reverting commit 1f6243b6 in bookworm-backports
> branch. Should I also revert it in sid branch? The reason for asking is
> that I'm coming from Fedora world. In Fedora above revert would only be
> in bookworm-backports branch, not in sid. I assume the same is true for
> Debian.

You can carry stable-backports specific changes/patches as long as they are 
documented in debian/changelog.  Often this is necessary for compatibility 
with the dependencies that are available in stable-backports.  These will be 
accepted as long as the changes are minimal in nature (which it sounds like 
this is if it is just reverting one commit).

-- 
Soren Stoutner
soren@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: