Bug#1104244: RFS: foomuuri/0.28-1 [ITA] -- multizone bidirectional nftables firewall
> > > * Package name : foomuuri
> > > Version : 0.28-1
> > > Upstream contact : Kim B. Heino <b@bbbs.net>
> > > * URL : https://github.com/FoobarOy/foomuuri
> > > * License : GPL-2+
> > > * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/kimheino/foomuuri
> > > Section : net
>
> Mostly looks good. The only problem I see is that, because foomuuri
> is being back-ported to Bookworm, the systemd files cannot be
> unconditio- nally installed into /usr/lib/systemd:
> dh-sequence-movetousr needs to be retained.
Oh, yes. That would be reverting commit 1f6243b6 in bookworm-backports
branch. Should I also revert it in sid branch? The reason for asking is
that I'm coming from Fedora world. In Fedora above revert would only be
in bookworm-backports branch, not in sid. I assume the same is true for
Debian.
> How do you want to proceed? Did you create the ITA bug report because
> you do want to become the foomuuri package maintainer, or because it
> had been orphaned and you wanted to make sure that somebody was
> looking after it? My suggestion would be to create a foomuuri team
> with both of us as members (despite my somewhat tardy answers over
> the last month or so, I am usually more responsive :)). I can give
> you commit priv's to the repo and do the uploads.
I want somebody maintaining it for Debian. As there were no volunteers
I decided to do it myself. So a team of us two (or more) would be the
best solution.
> As Phil Wyett (thanks for your tireless work on debian-mentors, btw)
> pointed out earlier, Trixie is currently frozen, so the new upload
> will have to wait till Trixie is released, but we can get everything
> set up and ready to go once the time comes.
Yes, Trixie must wait for reopen. Can it still be uploaded to
bookworm-backports while waiting for Trixie?
Reply to: