Bug#1067930: RFS: python-keep/2.10.1-1 [ITP] -- Personal shell command keeper and snippets manager
* Shriram Ravindranathan <s20n@ters.dev> [240828 05:30]:
> On 27/08/24 22:45, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > | Section: python
> >
> > Why? That keep is implemented in python is an implementation detail.
> > Why not "shells" or "education" or even "utils" instead?
> That makes sense, I will change it to an appropriate section.
> > | Source: python-keep
>
> I felt 'keep' was a bit too generic a name for the package.
It is. But adding "python" in front doesn't help. Your package will
also still take the "keep" program name, so renaming the package
doesn't help.
> moreover, several other python packages in Debian seemed to be doing the
> same (for instance https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python-raccoon
> from https://github.com/rsheftel/raccoon)
python-raccoon is a library. Your package is a program meant to be
directly used. Taking conclusions from libraries and applying to
programs is usually a bad idea.
> Would it be better if I kept the original name?
Probably.
Would be good if upstream would pick a less generic name, but
changing that downstream usually just confuses everyone.
Chris
Reply to: