Bug#1054422: RFS: pointback/0.2-5 [RC] [Team] -- restore window points when returning to buffers
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:12:50AM -0700, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: important
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pointback":
>
> * Package name : pointback
> Version : 0.2-5
> Upstream contact : Markus Triska <markus.triska@gmx.at>
> * URL : https://www.metalevel.at/pointback/
> * License : GPL-3+
> * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/emacsen-team/pointback
> Section : lisp
>
> The source builds the following binary packages:
>
> elpa-pointback - restore window points when returning to buffers
>
> To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/pointback/
>
> Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:
>
> dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pointback/pointback_0.2-5.dsc
>
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> pointback (0.2-5) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
> * Team upload.
> .
> [ Nicholas D Steeves ]
> * Drop emacs24 and emacs25 from Enhances (packages do not exist in
> bullseye).
> .
> [ Debian Janitor ]
> * Bump debhelper from old 10 to 13.
> * Set debhelper-compat version in Build-Depends.
> .
> [ Xiyue Deng ]
> * Add patch migrate-from-removed-assoc-el.patch to migrate from
> obsoleted functions in assoc.el which has been removed since Emacs
> 29.1 (Closes: #1042900).
> * Drop Built-Using which should not be used for an "arch: all" package.
> * Update Standards-Version to 4.6.2. No change needed.
> * Drop emacs version in Recommends which is from oldoldstable.
> * Add d/watch with comments of no real upstream version control.
> * Update d/copyright year and add Upstream-Contact.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Xiyue Deng
Looks good, but one question:
Upstream says:
As of Emacs 26.1, switch-to-buffer-preserve-window-point defaults to t, which solves the problem that pointback.el addresses.
Is this pacakge (pointback) obsolete and should it be kept in Debian?
(As the package is fine, I'm uploadig it, but if it is obsolete, please
file a bug for removal.)
Please also investiate:
I: elpa-pointback: wrong-section-according-to-package-name lisp => editors
--
tobi
Reply to: