Thanks for for the couple replies I got! On 2023-09-03 08:23, Bo YU wrote: > Hi Antonio！ > > On Sun, Sep 3, 2023 at 2:30 AM Antonio Russo <aerusso@aerusso.net> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I opened an ITP-closing RFS bug about a month and a half ago. It's got 0 replies. >> > >>From my past experience, It is rare for an RFS to get 0 replies. But > unfortunately, > It's quite possible that when you opened the RFS, there was a flood of > RFS here but > your RFS was buried. > >> Is it OK for me to try to bump this? I would have at least hoped to get someone to say >> "I don't think this is fit for debian." before giving up on it. > > I would like to suggest you ping the RFS once a/two week until a DD > picks up your package. > All Debian participants are volunteers, so please relax :) I'll re-post the RFS on a day it looks like the list is quiet. I also got a suggestion to contact related DDs directly. I'll try that as well. > Thanks for your contributions to Debian. > > BR, > Bo Antonio
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0xB01C53D5DED4A4EE.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature