[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#982164: RFS: geda-gaf/1.10.2-2 [ITA] -- GPL EDA -- Electronics design software



On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 11:13:53 +0200 Juhani Numminen
<juhaninumminen0@gmail.com> wrote:

> Please also close these two bugs in your changelog:
> 
>  #975985, ITA is to be closed when you set yourself as the new
>           maintainer/uploader [1]
> 
>  #747424, requesting the new upstream version

done.

> The changelog should mention that Bdale removed himself from the list
> of Uploaders. [2]

done.
 

> The mentors.d.n page shows that the packages still depend on python2,
> so are you first making the package name change python->python2
> (#966736) and only later switching to python3 (#936593)?

yes.
I know, migration to python3 is inevitable. However, the transition
from geda-gaf-1.8 to 1.10 involved large amounts of python code. I
talked to upstream (Roland Lutz): Migration to python3 will be a little
tedious and non-trivial. It will be the main focus of upcoming
development, non the less.


> If that's the
> case, we need to unmerge #966736 and #936593.
> 
> [1] https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#l3
> [2]
> https://salsa.debian.org/electronics-team/geda-gaf/-/commit/8633b12b984541ab5ca1c139ffed7d10b3871439

Beeing new to Debian package maintenance, I am unsure how to proceed on
this. Should I act on the bugs? Am I allowed to set tags? If so which
would be appropriate?

---<)kaimartin(>---

-- 
Kai-Martin Knaak
Email: kmk@familieknaak.de
Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel:
https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=index&search=0x7B0F9882

Attachment: pgpK3QxC_Bkdi.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: