[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#962669: Bug#962672: buster-pu: package ca-certificates/20200611~deb10u1



On Fri, 2020-06-12 at 00:50 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Control: tags 962669 moreinfo
> 
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 08:18:38PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 13:48 -0500, Michael Shuler wrote:
> > > On 6/11/20 1:33 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > Just to confirm - will the certificates be automatically re-
> > > > added (assuming that users have either the automatically trust
> > > > or prompt options enabled)?
> > > 
> > > (stretch-pu report cc'ed, since same applies)
> > > 
> > > Excellent question. I believe we're going to hit #743339
> > > "Previously removed certificates not added again". I had not
> > > found a reasonable fix for that case in general, to preserve a
> > > user's selections.
> > > Maybe a "good enough" fix will have to do for the specific ones
> > > added back.
> > 
> > OK.
> > 
> > In that case, how does this seem as an SUA text?
[...]
> > use the affected certificates, you may need to manually enable them
> > by running "dpkg-reconfigure ca-certificates" as root.
> > ====================
> 
> This does not work in various embedded scenarios.

Wouldn't embedded setups be more likely to have a hard-coded
configuration?

> Would it work to force-enable them in /etc/ca-certificates.conf
> from the preinst when upgrading from old-version matching 20200601* ?

I'll leave the technical answer to Michael.

Practically, it's then not great for users who had intentionally
removed the certificates - or simply decided not to trust them in the
first place - prior to the upgrade. I'm not sure how we could
distinguish the cases automatically.

> Unrelated to that, please keep the Python 2 -> 3 build dependency
> change out of this emergency update.

ACK.

Regards,

Adam


Reply to: