Don't break threads please. On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 10:28:53PM -0500, Elías Alejandro wrote: > >The command is the same, isn't it? > uhm.. I don't think so. You need to explain why. > I was reading about to source-only > uploads because of[1] however I've uploaded by _mistake_ > with a changes file included binary and source, after > some hours I've noticed that it hasn't been built by buildd[2]. This sounds good. > I'd like to generate a changes file for a new debian > version of the package with only the source. This sounds good too. So what's wrong with the command? > I was reading also that if version ends in -0 or -1 source can be > included but not for the next version, I'm not sure if it's the > explanation. And this doesn't, as this talks about inclusion of orig.tar in the source package, not about things you talked earlier. This is a completely unrelated question but no, you don't need to include orig.tar in the source changes if it waas already uploaded previously. > In other hand, why buildd wasn't be able to built if the > changes file also included the source file? buildds do not build binaries that were uploaded by the uploader. -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature