[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Removing lintian warnings? (package games/dmagnetic)



Hello Matthew.

Yes, it does explain EVERYTHING in great detail.
Unfortunately, that is the opposite of helpful. ;)

Thomas
> Matthew Fernandez <matthew.fernandez@gmail.com> hat am 7. Oktober 2019 um 17:02 geschrieben:
> 
> 
> 
> > On Oct 7, 2019, at 01:25, Thomas Dettbarn <dettus@dettus.net> wrote:
> > 
> > Hello!
> > 
> > Currently, I am trying to get my package dMagnetic into 
> > Debian's repository. You can find it at 
> > 
> > https://mentors.debian.net/package/dmagnetic
> > 
> > Despite my best effords, there are still a handful of lintian warnings left. Naturally, I would like to get rid of them:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > – Package is not in Debian
> > – Package has lintian informational warnings
> > dmagnetic source
> > 
> >    I debian-watch-uses-insecure-uri
> >        http://www.dettus.net/dMagnetic
> >    I testsuite-autopkgtest-missing
> >    P rules-requires-root-missing
> >    X debian-watch-does-not-check-gpg-signature
> > 
> > dmagnetic
> > 
> >    I description-synopsis-might-not-be-phrased-properly
> >        "Play classic textadventures from Magnetic Scrolls in glorious ANSI Art."
> >    I hardening-no-bindnow
> >        usr/games/dMagnetic
> >    I hardening-no-fortify-functions
> >        usr/games/dMagnetic
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Whilst there is nothing I will be able to do about the "insecure iru" and "gpg signature", the "rules-requires-root-missing" is bugging me. 
> > What EXACTLY is it that I have to put into the debian/control and debian/rules files, so that this message disappears? The only root-permissions my package needs are during the installation process. Not whilst building, not whilst running.
> > 
> > PLEASE DO NOT JUST COPY&PASTE A LINK TO THE DOCUMENTATION IN HERE. PLEASE HELP ME.
> 
> I believe this requires a “Rules-Requires-Root: no” line in debian/control. Also, while you said not to link to documentation, I should note that if you click through the warning on the package page that you linked it tells you the extended description of this tag that is fairly explicit.


Reply to: