[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#932915: RFS: qcoan/2.0-6



On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 10:00:45AM +0200, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
> This is a strange error. I have tested the package locally on Debian 10 as
> well as on Debian 8 and Debian 9 via the OpenSuSE build service.

Well, "Debian 9" is oldstable, while all new packages must go to unstable
(and at most get backported later).  That's a difference of two major
releases (ok, maybe 1.2 releases as to-be-Bullseye is very young, although
it did already see the flurry of post-Buster upload).  No wonder the package
fails to build.

> For the obs it tests building the package in a previously empty chroot and
> installs only the packages given via the build dependencies.  Consequently
> I can exclude that there is some missing dependency.

Also, I see that that OpenSuSE build service uses some hacked up homebrewed
dependency resolution -- it likely has a different behaviour than native
Debian tools, which also may be the culprit.

> I´m afraid you will have to research what causes that error message on your
> computer.

The official archive requires all packages to be buildable on unstable using
sbuild; pbuilder may also work -- it has different defaults (notably,
doesn't strip alternative build-dependencies) but those don't apply to your
package.

I haven't started the real review yet -- just tried if it builds -- but I
already see that the -dbg package is obsolete; these are built automatically
since quite a while ago.

> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 07:02:13PM +0200, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
> > >   * Package name    : qcoan
> > >     Version         : 2.0-6


Meow!
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian is one big family.  Including that weird uncle
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ and ultra-religious in-laws.
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀


Reply to: