[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#930595: marked as done (RFS: uacme/1.0.16-7 [ITP])

Your message dated Thu, 4 Jul 2019 01:32:02 +0200
with message-id <20190703233202.GA18970@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#930595: RFS: uacme/1.0.15-2 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #930595,
regarding RFS: uacme/1.0.16-7 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
930595: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=930595
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "uacme"

* Package name    : uacme
  Version         : 1.0.15-2
  Upstream Author : Nicola Di Lieto <nicola.dilieto@gmail.com>
* URL             : https://github.com/ndilieto/uacme
* License         : GPL-3.0+
  Section         : net

It builds those binary packages:

uacme - Lightweight client for the RFC8555 ACMEv2 protocol

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/uacme

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/uacme/uacme_1.0.15-2.dsc

More information about uacme can be obtained from https://github.com/ndilieto/uacme

The repository on github follows the recommended DEP-14 branch layout

Regards,
Nicola Di Lieto

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 11:05:41PM +0200, Nicola Di Lieto wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 02:40:30AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > One issue is the watch file being empty (save for comments).  If there's
> > nothing inside, it should be deleted.  But, for a Github project that does
> > sane release, it's too trivial to fill it instead:
> 
> Done, but since I use pristine-tar and import tarballs made by 'make dist',
> the orig tarball is not downloadable anywhere, and therefore it wasn't
> exactly trivial to get it to work.

Hmm right, old style autotool tarballs indeed contain non-source files.
I assumed your workflow without looking, my bad.

> > Thus, unless there's a good reason, such changelog entries get squashed;
> > and, since there's no previous release, just a single "Initial release
> > (Closes: #123456)" is enough.  Also, both people and tools tend to get
> > confused when there's a -7 but no -1.
> 
> Done. I took the chance to include some minor changes in a new upstream too,
> so debian version is now 1.0.17-1

Awesome.

> Note: I will push debian/1.0.17 to github after you confirm you are happy
> with how it is.

Looks good to me -- in NEW.  Thanks for your work!


Meow.
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Autotools hint: to do a zx-spectrum build on a pdp11 host, type:
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀   ./configure --host=zx-spectrum --build=pdp11
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀

--- End Message ---
Reply to: