[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#927293:



> The package seems in good shape, except for the "inih" one-file library.
> It's under a different license, thus it needs a separate entry in
> debian/copyright.  Also, as it's already packaged in Debian, it might
> be better to use that copy rather than what's in tree.

Hello!
Thank you for checking the package and for pointing this out.
Unfortunately, it seems that the upstream `inih` is not compatible
with the editor anymore -- the internal copy is either historical or
modified, and relies on slightly different library API.

Fixing the incompatibility requires larger path than what would be
maintainable. I have contacted upstream author about whether there's
some serious reason for keeping the bundled version; I'll modify the
package accordingly (either changing license or unbundling the
library) when I get the info.

:]


Reply to: