[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#926306: RFS: socklog/2.1.0-9



[2019-04-13 11:11] Mathieu Mirmont <mat@parad0x.org>
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 05:22:35PM +0000, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> > [2019-04-10 23:48] Mathieu Mirmont <mat@parad0x.org>
> > >
> > > part 1     text/plain                 434
> > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 08:20:30AM +0000, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> > > > You can repack it as new upstream version. New version would be
> > > > something like `2.1.0+repack-1'. Do not forget add clarification into
> > > > Debian.source.
> > >
> > > I've updated the package and uploaded to mentors:
> > >
> > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/socklog
> > > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/socklog/socklog_2.1.0+repack-1.dsc
> > 
> > Lintian (2.11.0) warnings:
> > 
> > 	W: socklog: missing-versioned-depends-on-init-system-helpers postinst:152 "update-rc.d defaults
> -disabled" needs i
> > 	nit-system-helpers >= 1.50
>
> Embarassingly I don't know how to get rid of this one. I've added a
> depencency on init-system-helpers (>= 1.50) naturally but the warning
> remains.
>
> Since ${misc:Pre-Depends} already includes init-system-helpers (>=
> 1.54~) I added lintian overrides. It's a bit dirty though, and the
> line number makes it a moving target. I'll fix the line numbers in the
> lintian overrides but if you know how to fix this in a better way I'm
> all ears.

I see. I suggest you to submit bug aganist Lintian, but in mean time I
am fine uploading with overrides. It may be useful to add reference to
that bug in override comment.

> > Oh, and extremely minor notice: in `debian/control' you align fields
> > with tabs. It does not look pretty, if tabstop is not 8. What about
> > expand(1)?
>
> Ah yeah sorry, I'll untabify this.

Thank you. By the way, you know about wrap-and-sort(1)?
-- 
        Note, that I send and fetch email in batch, once every 24 hours.
                 If matter is urgent, try https://t.me/kaction
                                                                             --


Reply to: