Bug#926306: RFS: socklog/2.1.0-9

[Dmitry Bogatov <KAction@debian.org>]

[2019-04-04 13:30] Mathieu Mirmont <mat@parad0x.org>
> > * I know, it is pain, but there should be init.d script. You may want to
> >   take a look at bcron=0.11-8.
>
> Sure, no worries. How about systemd service files? It makes little sense
> to run socklog along with systemd I think, but for the principle it may
> be required to profile service files. What do you think?

Up to you. Presence of systemd unit files is not mandated by Policy,
unlike init.d scripts.

> >   I believe there should be separate sysuser for socklog-* services.
> >   Ideally, separate sysuser for /every/ from socklog-* service, but I do
> >   not know, whehter it is possible.
>
> Yeah good point. I tend to think that a single user for all socklog-*
> services would be enough, but if you prefer I can add one user per
> service.

Yes, I'd prefer as much separation, as possible.

> Thanks for the review!

My pleasure. By the way, you seems to forgot to add changelog entry
about new maintainer. Something in lines:

  * Set myself as maintainer (Closes: #<orphan-bug-of-socklog>)
-- 
        Note, that I send and fetch email in batch, once every 24 hours.
                 If matter is urgent, try https://t.me/kaction
                                                                             --