[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#923162: RFS: python-rfid/1.2 [ITP] -- friendly greeter



On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 10:34:24PM +0100, Philipp Meisberger wrote:
> the doc/RDM6300_doc.pdf is just a datasheet taken from
> https://elty.pl/upload/download/RFID/RDM630-Spec.pdf. Should I remove it
> since I do not have a build script? 
Yes, you need to repack the orig tarball to not ship a non-free file.

> I prefer having just one repo. But if it is necessary I upload it on salsa.
It's not necessary to have the repo on salsa. But it's helpful to have a
repo that can be used to build the package. This implies certain things
about the file layout and the branch layout which are not true for your
repo. You may look at git-buildpackage if you are interested, buyt I
suspect you'll need to improve your upstream workflows to be able to use
it (starting with moving the actual module source to the top level).
Though it looks like it's not even on PyPI?


-- 
WBR, wRAR

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: